The Relevance Today of A Jury of Her Peers Essay -- A Jury of Her Peer

In "A Jury of Her Peers," Susan Glaspell illustrates umteen kindly standards women experienced at the turn of the century. She allows the reader to see how a womans life was completely govern by social laws, and thus by her hubby. Glaspell also reveals the ignorance of the men in the story, in particular the sheriff and the county attorney. I think some examples are quite a extreme, but in Glaspells day, they would choose probably been common. Women did non have many rights at the turn of the century. What few rights and freedoms they did have were dominated by social standards. They were expected to cater to their married mans wishes and commands. I think their society oppressed them more(prenominal) often than their own husbands did. A good example of this in "A Jury of Her Peers" is Martha Hale. Lewis Hale treats his wife as an qualified privately, but does not treat her as an equal in public. When Mrs. Hale attempts to interrupt her husband as he tells th e county attorney what he experienced in the Wright home she does not treat him as a master, but as an equal (Glaspell 260). Clearly she is not afraid of him. Many women at this time would have never even attempted to distract or interrupt their husband while they talked. Clearly defined gender roles are prevalent passim "A Jury of Her Peers." Men are supposed to work extracurricular of the home, and women are supposed to work inside the home. Neither the men nor the women await to appreciate the others wo...