Template for Review of Journal Article Essay

IntroductionGive an overview of the phrase. instructionWhat are the learn points in this article?What did I find large or interesting about these key points? How relevant are the key points to my character as a teacher?What do I outfit or disagree with in this article?How has this article influenced me in thinking deeply about my values, beliefs and assumptions? How specifically go forth I be sufficient to use the information and familiarity to reform or leaven my dogma and learning in terms of approaches, strategies, methods or techniques? ConclusionWhat new insights/discoveries acquit I made in relation to article review? How will I make use of this new knowledge in succeeding(a)?What further information or knowledge should I seek to exaggerate my knowledge in relation to the cases of this article?N.B. Minimum of 2 pages (A4) or 800 words, Font size 12, 1 margin all round. recreate review FIVE articles as proposed and subscribe to to Mr. Chee by Week-10, as your concourse assignment.ORPlease review ONE article as proposed and submit to Mr. Chee by Week-10, as your INDIVIDUAL assignment.Rubrics for Assessing Journal Article Review pass judgmentDescription of Quality of WorkExcellent (A)80 and above truly clear focus and clarity of vistas and expression. Key points are well certain and described in detail. Excellent analysis of article contentedness that is discerning, in-depth and support by both pedagogical and personal knowledge. Ability to touch content to cardinals role and competencies as a teacher is show in an outstanding manner. There is a high quality of consideration as can be seen in the ability to relate to ones values, beliefs and experiences to the content of the article. The reviewer is able to suggest how the information and knowledge could be adopted or adapted innovatively to enhance or improve teaching and learning. Personal insights and views that are expressed show that the reviewer has thought critically and refle ctively about the article and the effects on his/her role as a researcher.The review is clear, well organized with logical sequencing and blowup of key points. All key points are adequately detailed and on that point is in-depth analysis of some of the points. Good effort has also been made to relate the content of the article to ones role and competencies as a teacher and interesting ideas were proposed for improving or enhancing management. Insights and discoveries made show a nigh(a) understanding of the article content and that that the reviewer has made good effort to reflect on his/her values, beliefs and experiences.There is adequate analysis of the article content but with some points detailed more than others. Relationship is haggard between some key points and ones role and competencies as a researcher. The reviewer was able to suggest how the information and knowledge could be applied in teaching and learning to improve or enhance current practices. Overall, the revie w is satisfactory in that it shows an overall understanding of the content and the ability to reflect on the content to obtain adequate benefits as a researcher.Unsatisfactory (F)Below 60The review is lacking in focus and clarity of expression. Key points not elaborated upon and details are minimal. Little analysis of content. Minimal reflection and insights given.